<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Post on Rain Oversky</title><link>https://rain.oversky.cloud/post/</link><description>Recent content in Post on Rain Oversky</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 21:43:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://rain.oversky.cloud/post/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The first ceiling of LLM AI's?</title><link>https://rain.oversky.cloud/p/the-first-ceiling-of-llm-ais/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 21:43:24 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://rain.oversky.cloud/p/the-first-ceiling-of-llm-ais/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was testing the AI ​​through VSCode Copilot. I had a piece of code that didn&amp;rsquo;t seem efficient, so I tried using the latest (and most expensive) model available at the time: Claude Opus 4.6.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The result wasn&amp;rsquo;t bad; it gave me two suggestions, one more convincing than the other. But what surprised me was that the suggested code included a &lt;code&gt;using&lt;/code&gt; statement at the top: &lt;code&gt;using godot&lt;/code&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Godot&lt;/em&gt;? The project is a Unity game. I imagine a &lt;em&gt;godot&lt;/em&gt; library exists within a &lt;em&gt;Godot&lt;/em&gt; context, but why assume that engine? Don&amp;rsquo;t newer models read the context or at least the file structure anymore?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>